From the Hydroxyapatite Gum Database · data checked July 11, 2026

CaviChew vs Minvelle: what each discloses.

Two hydroxyapatite gums, compared only on what each brand publicly discloses: dose, particle data, ingredients, lab documents and guarantee terms. Same rows as the public database this page is generated from.

What each brand publishes CaviChew Minvelle
Hydroxyapatite per piece not disclosed 5.7 mg nano-HAp
0.30% of a 1.9 g piece
Particle form and size Nano, ≤100 nm rod-shaped (stated) Nano, 200 nm (supplier-stated)
disclosed: sits above the EU’s <100 nm nanomaterial definition
Full ingredient list Yes
no amounts
 Yes
all 14, with per-piece weights
Lab reports public No Yes
MSDS + batch CoA published (manufacturer redacted, disclosed)
Studies cited on site No
refers to studies on "other remineralizing gums"
 Partial
pH study sourced; history claims being back-referenced
Money-back guarantee not disclosed 30 days
Verifiability scorecard CaviChew Minvelle
Dose disclosed not disclosed Yes
5.7 mg nano per piece
Documents downloadable 0 2
MSDS + batch CoA (PDF)
Guarantee in writing not found (checked 2026-07-11) Yes
30-day, unopened boxes
Reviews verifiable off-site Yes
Amazon: 193 reviews, 4.3★
 No
Trustpilot profile claimed, shows 0 reviews so far

CaviChew does not publish a per-piece dose, offers 0, and lists its guarantee as not disclosed. Minvelle publishes its per-piece dose, offers 2, and lists its guarantee as 30 days. Every cell above is what each brand states publicly, nothing is scored on taste or opinion; where a cell says not disclosed, the claim could not be verified from the brand’s own materials.

Full disclosure

Minvelle maintains this database, and sits in it.

Same rows, same standards, our own cells included, weak spots and all. Judge us by the table, not this button.

See the gum