Crait vs Minvelle: what each discloses.
Two hydroxyapatite gums, compared only on what each brand publicly discloses: dose, particle data, ingredients, lab documents and guarantee terms. Same rows as the public database this page is generated from.
| What each brand publishes | Crait | Minvelle |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyapatite per piece |
70 mg non-nano HAp (gum) separate mints state 25 mg; see note 1 before comparing
|
5.7 mg nano-HAp 0.30% of a 1.9 g piece
|
| Particle form and size |
Non-nano (OMYADENT®) described as larger, surface-acting particles
|
Nano, 200 nm (supplier-stated) disclosed: sits above the EU’s <100 nm nanomaterial definition
|
| Full ingredient list |
Yes 9 ingredients, no amounts
|
Yes all 14, with per-piece weights
|
| Lab reports public | No |
Yes MSDS + batch CoA published (manufacturer redacted, disclosed)
|
| Studies cited on site |
No "studies show" without citations
|
Partial pH study sourced; history claims being back-referenced
|
| Money-back guarantee | not disclosed | 30 days |
| Verifiability scorecard | Crait | Minvelle |
|---|---|---|
| Dose disclosed |
Yes 70 mg gum / 25 mg mints
|
Yes 5.7 mg nano per piece
|
| Documents downloadable | 0 |
2 MSDS + batch CoA (PDF)
|
| Guarantee in writing | not found (checked 2026-07-11) |
Yes 30-day, unopened boxes
|
| Reviews verifiable off-site |
Yes Amazon listings; exact count not machine-readable
|
No Trustpilot profile claimed, shows 0 reviews so far
|
Crait publishes its per-piece dose, offers 0, and lists its guarantee as not disclosed. Minvelle publishes its per-piece dose, offers 2, and lists its guarantee as 30 days. Every cell above is what each brand states publicly, nothing is scored on taste or opinion; where a cell says not disclosed, the claim could not be verified from the brand’s own materials.
Minvelle maintains this database, and sits in it.
Same rows, same standards, our own cells included, weak spots and all. Judge us by the table, not this button.
See the gum