From the Hydroxyapatite Gum Database · data checked July 11, 2026

Crait vs Weldental: what each discloses.

Two hydroxyapatite gums, compared only on what each brand publicly discloses: dose, particle data, ingredients, lab documents and guarantee terms. Same rows as the public database this page is generated from.

What each brand publishes Crait Weldental
Hydroxyapatite per piece 70 mg non-nano HAp (gum)
separate mints state 25 mg; see note 1 before comparing
not disclosed
Particle form and size Non-nano (OMYADENT®)
described as larger, surface-acting particles
"Micro" HAp
no numeric size given
Full ingredient list Yes
9 ingredients, no amounts
Yes
no amounts
Lab reports public No No
Studies cited on site No
"studies show" without citations
No
Money-back guarantee not disclosed Non-returnable on Amazon (food safety); site policy 30 days unused
Verifiability scorecard Crait Weldental
Dose disclosed Yes
70 mg gum / 25 mg mints
not disclosed
Documents downloadable 0 0
Guarantee in writing not found (checked 2026-07-11) Yes
30-day, unused only
Reviews verifiable off-site Yes
Amazon listings; exact count not machine-readable
Yes
Amazon: 71 ratings, 4.4★

Crait publishes its per-piece dose, offers 0, and lists its guarantee as not disclosed. Weldental does not publish a per-piece dose, offers 0, and lists its guarantee as non-returnable on amazon (food safety); site policy 30 days unused. Every cell above is what each brand states publicly, nothing is scored on taste or opinion; where a cell says not disclosed, the claim could not be verified from the brand’s own materials.

This comparison is generated from the Hydroxyapatite Gum Database, maintained by Minvelle. We sell a gum in this category and appear in the same database under identical rules, which is exactly why every cell here is sourced instead of scored.