From the Hydroxyapatite Gum Database · data checked July 11, 2026

Dentagum vs RevitaBite: what each discloses.

Two hydroxyapatite gums, compared only on what each brand publicly discloses: dose, particle data, ingredients, lab documents and guarantee terms. Same rows as the public database this page is generated from.

What each brand publishes Dentagum RevitaBite
Hydroxyapatite per piece not disclosed not disclosed
Particle form and size Nano
particle size not stated
Nano
particle size not stated; liquid-center, dentist-formulated
Full ingredient list Yes
no amounts
Yes
no amounts; liquid centre marketed as "proprietary"
Lab reports public Partial
heavy-metal figures shown; report link not retrievable
No
Studies cited on site No
"83% / 91% / 87%" shown without sources
No
dentist-formulated claims, no study citations found
Money-back guarantee 30 days claimed on product page; refund policy states 14 days, unopened 30 days
money-back, "no questions"
Verifiability scorecard Dentagum RevitaBite
Dose disclosed not disclosed not disclosed
Documents downloadable 0
a CoA is shown as an on-page image, not downloadable
0
Guarantee in writing Conflicting
"30-day risk-free" on page; refund policy allows unopened only (EU 14 days)
Yes
30-day money-back, "no questions"
Reviews verifiable off-site Yes
Amazon: 644 reviews, 4.4★ (site widget claims 733)
No
on-site testimonials only

Dentagum does not publish a per-piece dose, offers 0, and lists its guarantee as 30 days claimed on product page; refund policy states 14 days, unopened. RevitaBite does not publish a per-piece dose, offers 0, and lists its guarantee as 30 days. Every cell above is what each brand states publicly, nothing is scored on taste or opinion; where a cell says not disclosed, the claim could not be verified from the brand’s own materials.

This comparison is generated from the Hydroxyapatite Gum Database, maintained by Minvelle. We sell a gum in this category and appear in the same database under identical rules, which is exactly why every cell here is sourced instead of scored.