Minvelle vs VanMan: what each discloses.
Two hydroxyapatite gums, compared only on what each brand publicly discloses: dose, particle data, ingredients, lab documents and guarantee terms. Same rows as the public database this page is generated from.
| What each brand publishes | Minvelle | VanMan |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyapatite per piece |
5.7 mg nano-HAp 0.30% of a 1.9 g piece
|
not disclosed |
| Particle form and size |
Nano, 200 nm (supplier-stated) disclosed: sits above the EU’s <100 nm nanomaterial definition
|
Bovine-bone HAp nano/non-nano not stated
|
| Full ingredient list |
Yes all 14, with per-piece weights
|
Yes 6 ingredients, no amounts
|
| Lab reports public |
Yes MSDS + batch CoA published (manufacturer redacted, disclosed)
|
No |
| Studies cited on site |
Partial pH study sourced; history claims being back-referenced
|
No |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | Yes, no time window stated |
| Verifiability scorecard | Minvelle | VanMan |
|---|---|---|
| Dose disclosed |
Yes 5.7 mg nano per piece
|
not disclosed |
| Documents downloadable |
2 MSDS + batch CoA (PDF)
|
0 |
| Guarantee in writing |
Yes 30-day, unopened boxes
|
Yes full refund, no time window stated
|
| Reviews verifiable off-site |
No Trustpilot profile claimed, shows 0 reviews so far
|
Yes Amazon: 135 ratings, 3.5★
|
Minvelle publishes its per-piece dose, offers 2, and lists its guarantee as 30 days. VanMan does not publish a per-piece dose, offers 0, and lists its guarantee as yes, no time window stated. Every cell above is what each brand states publicly, nothing is scored on taste or opinion; where a cell says not disclosed, the claim could not be verified from the brand’s own materials.
Minvelle maintains this database, and sits in it.
Same rows, same standards, our own cells included, weak spots and all. Judge us by the table, not this button.
See the gum