The 2026 report card

The Disclosure Grades.

Nine hydroxyapatite gum brands, graded on one thing only: what they publish. Dose per piece, particle data, full ingredient amounts, downloadable lab documents, a guarantee in writing. Not how good the product is — what the label and the website actually tell you before you pay.

Grades recompute the day a brand publishes. Every underlying cell is sourced in the full database.

The rubric

Five questions, scored mechanically

  1. Dose per piece published? A number, in mg, on the brand's own pages.
  2. Particle data published? Nano or non-nano, with a numeric size.
  3. Full ingredient list with amounts? Names alone score half.
  4. Lab documents downloadable? A CoA or safety data sheet you can open, not a badge.
  5. Money-back guarantee in writing? A stated window, findable in policy.

Scoring: published = 1 point · partial = ½ · not published = 0. A ≥ 4.5 · B ≥ 3.5 · C ≥ 2.5 · D ≥ 1.5 · F below. No editorial judgement, no quality opinion — anyone can recompute every grade from the table below.

As of 16 August 2026

The grades

✓ published · ± partial · ✗ not published. Source cells and dates for every entry live in the database; most recent full sweep 11 July 2026.

GradeBrandScoreDose per pieceParticle dataIngredients + amountsLab documentsGuarantee in writing
A Minvellethat’s us — check us hardest 5.0 5.7 mg nano per piece (0.30% of a 1.9 g piece) nano, 200 nm, supplier-stated all 14, with per-piece amounts MSDS + batch CoA, downloadable 30 days, unopened boxes
C Enamio 2.5 not published nano, 20 nm rod-shaped, stated ± list, no amounts “3rd-party tested” badge, no report 30 days, first order only
D Craitthe only other brand publishing a dose 2.0 70 mg non-nano (gum); 25 mg (mints) ± non-nano stated, no numeric size ± 9 ingredients, no amounts none found not found in writing
D Dentagum 2.0 not published ± nano stated, size not stated ± list, no amounts ± heavy-metal figures shown as an image, not downloadable ± conflicting: product page says 30 days, refund policy differs
D VanMan 2.0 not published ± bovine-bone HAp; nano status not stated ± 6 ingredients, no amounts none found full refund, no time window stated
D Weldental 2.0 not published ± “micro” HAp, no numeric size ± list, no amounts none found 30 days, unused only
D RevitaBite 2.0 not published ± nano stated, size not stated; “proprietary” liquid centre ± list, no amounts none found 30 days, in writing
D CaviChew 1.5 not published nano, ≤100 nm rod-shaped, stated ± list, no amounts none found not found in writing
F Underbrushby Nathan & Sons 1.0 not published ± nano stated, size not stated ± list, no amounts none found gum is final sale; guarantee only via a paid add-on

Not graded: Larineco (site blocks automated reading — no cell could be sourced) and Baumkau (German-language shop, outside the database’s current scope). Both stay on the watchlist.

Read this before quoting the table

The fine print, up front

We sell one of the graded products.

This page is maintained by Minvelle. That is exactly why the grades are mechanical, the rubric is published, and every cell links to the brand’s own pages in the sourced database. Check us hardest. Corrections: max@minvelle.com — fixes are made in public.

A grade is not a quality verdict.

These grades measure disclosure, nothing else. A brand with an excellent product and a bare website scores low here; that is the point of the exercise, not a flaw in it. Nano and non-nano milligrams are also not directly comparable — a bigger number is not automatically a better one.

The standing offer, to every brand on this page.

Publish your dose, your particle data, or your lab report, and email us. Your grade is recomputed and this page is updated, with the date, at no cost, whether or not we like the result. The best outcome for buyers is a column of A grades — including the ones that beat ours.

Our own numbers, in the open.

5.7 mg nano-hydroxyapatite per piece, 200 nm, all 14 ingredients with amounts, MSDS and batch CoA as PDFs. Hold us to the same rubric.

See the documents

Or open the full sourced database →